Diaz v. State , 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5957 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla. 2011) ], and acknowledging “uncertainty caused by Shelton [v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011) ]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is constitutional).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 3D12-517

Citation Numbers: 85 So. 3d 1184, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5957, 2012 WL 1370899

Judges: Cortinas, Lagoa, Salter

Filed Date: 4/18/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024