All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2012-04 |
-
PER CURIAM. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and denying the motion for rehearing as untimely. Because the motion for rehearing was untimely, it did not toll the rendition of the final order for purposes of seeking this appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(h). This appeal is thus untimely and is DISMISSED. Gary v. State, 5 So.3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
PADOVANO, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D11-6854
Citation Numbers: 89 So. 3d 967, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6634, 2012 WL 1449252
Judges: Marstiller, Padovano, Rowe
Filed Date: 4/27/2012
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024