Kevin Taylor v. State , 242 So. 3d 1203 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FIFTH DISTRICT
    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    KEVIN TAYLOR,
    Appellant,
    v.                                                     Case No. 5D16-4252
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    ________________________________/
    Opinion filed April 13, 2018
    Appeal from the Circuit Court
    for Seminole County,
    Debra S. Nelson, Judge.
    Terrence E. Kehoe, of Law Office of
    Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp,
    Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
    Beach, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Kevin Taylor appeals his judgment and sentence for attempted human trafficking
    for the purpose of exploiting a child through commercial sexual activity and unlawful use
    of a two-way communication device in furtherance of the commission of a felony. Taylor
    raises the following arguments: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction
    for unlawful use of a two-way communication device in furtherance of a felony; 2) the trial
    court erred by limiting the cross-examination of a witness; 3) the State made improper
    comments during closing argument that warrant reversal and a new trial; 4) the trial court
    erred in imposing costs of investigation; and 5) the judgment failed to state that Taylor
    was tried by a jury.
    We agree that the trial court erred in imposing costs of investigation, as the State
    did not request them. See Foulkes v. State, 
    221 So. 3d 789
    , 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
    We therefore remand for the trial court to strike these costs from the judgment, noting that
    the State should be given the opportunity to request the imposition of costs.          See
    McCarthy v. State, 
    893 So. 2d 689
    , 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
    We also remand for the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error in the judgment,
    which failed to indicate that Taylor was tried by a jury and found guilty. See Harvey v.
    State, 
    146 So. 3d 66
    , 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). In all other respects, we affirm without
    further discussion.
    AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, REMANDED.
    SAWAYA, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 5D16-4252

Citation Numbers: 242 So. 3d 1203

Filed Date: 4/9/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/20/2018