Jacaranda, LLC v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC , 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16157 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    JACARANDA, LLC,                              )
    )
    Appellant,                      )
    )
    v.                                           )        Case No. 2D15-3561
    )
    GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,                   )
    )
    Appellee.                       )
    )
    Opinion filed November 2, 2016.
    Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130
    from the Circuit Court for Manatee County;
    John F. Lakin, Judge.
    Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa,
    for Appellant.
    David Rosenberg and Daniel S. Stein of
    Popkin & Rosaler, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for
    Appellee.
    BADALAMENTI, Judge.
    This is an appeal of a denial of a motion to vacate a final judgment of
    foreclosure premised upon the entry of a clerk's default. Jacaranda, LLC (Jacaranda)
    filed a quiet title action against Green Tree Servicing, LLC (Green Tree) concerning a
    property that Jacaranda purchased at a judicial auction. Green Tree subsequently filed
    a separate foreclosure action against Jacaranda concerning the same property.
    Although Green Tree initially served Jacaranda with process to notify Jacaranda of this
    foreclosure action, Green Tree failed to notify Jacaranda or Jacaranda's counsel that
    Green Tree had moved for and obtained a clerk's default in the foreclosure action. The
    trial court subsequently entered a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Green Tree
    and then denied Jacaranda's motion to vacate that final judgment. We hold that the trial
    court abused its discretion by denying Jacaranda's motion to vacate. Green Tree had
    actual knowledge both that Jacaranda intended to defend the foreclosure lawsuit and
    that Jacaranda was represented by counsel. As such, Green Tree's failure to notify
    Jacaranda or its counsel of its intention to seek the entry of a clerk's default invalidated
    the clerk's entry of default and rendered the subsequent final judgment it is premised
    upon vo
    id. We thus
    reverse the denial of Jacaranda's motion to vacate the final
    judgment and remand for proceedings on the merits.
    "An order denying a motion to vacate a clerk's default is reviewed under
    an abuse of discretion standard." Makes & Models Magazine, Inc. v. Web Offset
    Printing Co., 
    13 So. 3d 178
    , 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v.
    Lloyd, 
    981 So. 2d 633
    , 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). "We acknowledge that 'default
    judgments are generally not favored by the courts, and a court's discretion should be
    liberally exercised and all reasonable doubt resolved in favor of granting applications for
    relief so as to permit a determination of the controversy upon the merits.' " Paul v.
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 
    68 So. 3d 979
    , 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting U.S. Tobacco
    Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 
    444 So. 2d 81
    , 83 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)).
    -2-
    "[A] trial court should vacate an ex parte default when the 'plaintiff seeking
    default had actual knowledge that the defendant was represented by counsel and
    intended to defend the lawsuit, but failed to contact the defendant's counsel prior to
    seeking default.' " Makes & Models Magazine, 
    Inc., 13 So. 3d at 181
    (quoting 
    Lloyd, 981 So. 2d at 640
    ). A plaintiff has actual knowledge of a defendant's intention to defend
    a lawsuit and actual knowledge that the defendant is represented by counsel where the
    two parties simultaneously participate in another lawsuit which involves the same
    dispute and where plaintiff knew that defendant is represented by counsel in that other
    lawsuit. See 
    id. Here, the
    trial court was required to consider a two-part inquiry: (1)
    whether Green Tree had actual knowledge that Jacaranda intended to defend the
    foreclosure lawsuit, and (2) whether Green Tree had actual knowledge that Jacaranda
    was represented by counsel. See 
    id. (citing Lloyd,
    981 So. 2d at 639). Jacaranda's
    active participation in the quiet title action, which involved the same property, gave
    Green Tree actual knowledge of Jacaranda's intention to defend Green Tree's
    foreclosure action. See 
    id. Moreover, it
    is both undisputed and abundantly clear that
    Green Tree had actual knowledge that Jacaranda was represented by counsel in the
    quiet title action.
    Green Tree had an obligation to notify Jacaranda or Jacaranda's counsel
    prior to moving for default in the foreclosure action. See 
    id. Because Green
    Tree failed
    to satisfy this obligation, the clerk's default is invalid and the final judgment it is
    premised upon is therefore void. See 
    id. We thus
    reverse the trial court's denial of
    Jacaranda's motion to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure.
    -3-
    Reversed; remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
    SILBERMAN and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D15-3561

Citation Numbers: 203 So. 3d 964, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16157

Judges: Badalamenti, Silberman, Crenshaw

Filed Date: 11/2/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024