Wilfredo Pereira v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FIFTH DISTRICT
    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    WILFREDO PEREIRA,
    Appellant,
    v.                                                     Case No. 5D17-1096
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    ________________________________/
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018
    Appeal from the Circuit Court
    for Hernando County,
    Daniel B. Merritt, Sr., Judge.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and
    David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender,
    Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton,
    Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
    Beach, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    We affirm the judgment and sentence entered against Wilfredo Pereira after a jury
    found him guilty of dealing in stolen property. However, because the trial court failed to
    enter a written competency order after independently determining Pereira was competent
    to proceed, we remand for entry of a nunc pro tunc written order finding him competent.
    See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(b), (c)(7); Dougherty v. State, 
    149 So. 3d 672
    , 678-79 (Fla.
    2014) (finding trial court may by stipulation decide issue of competency based on written
    reports alone but must enter written order if defendant is found competent to proceed);
    Ortiz v. State, 
    55 So. 3d 724
    , 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (affirming judgment and sentence
    but remanding for entry of written competency order).
    AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
    BERGER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 5D17-1096

Filed Date: 4/16/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/27/2018