Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Claribell Okoli ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                        IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    DYCK-O’NEAL, INC.,                     NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    Appellant,                       DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    v.                                     CASE NO. 1D16-5710
    CLARIBELL OKOLI,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________/
    Opinion filed October 5, 2017.
    An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.
    David M. Snyder of David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B.
    Morrison of Law Offices of Susan B. Morris, P.A. Tampa; Joshua D. Moore of Law
    Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
    Tracy J. S. Frasier of Smith Frasier, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 
    201 So. 3d 157
     (Fla. 1st
    DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for
    deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a
    deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a
    deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 
    214 So. 3d 802
     (Fla.
    1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and
    decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).
    ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-5710

Filed Date: 10/4/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/5/2017