Edwardo De Juan v. State of Florida , 249 So. 3d 681 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    STATE OF FLORIDA
    _____________________________
    No. 1D18-0105
    _____________________________
    EDWARDO DE JUAN,
    Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________
    On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.
    Gregory S. Parker, Judge.
    April 30, 2018
    PER CURIAM.
    Following a jury trial in 2011, Appellant was convicted of
    escape and sentenced to fifteen years in prison. In May 2017,
    Appellant filed a motion in the trial court pursuant to rule
    3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, seeking to correct
    what Appellant claimed was an illegal sentence. In his motion,
    Appellant contended that the elements of escape were not met
    because he only went onto the roof of Taylor Correctional
    Institution while he was in custody and did not actually leave the
    prison. See § 944.40, Fla. Stat. (2010) (providing the elements of
    escape and establishing the crime as a second degree felony).
    Appellant therefore argued that he was at worst guilty of
    attempted escape. The trial court dismissed the motion and
    Appellant brought this appeal.
    Rule 3.800 is “not the correct procedural vehicle for attacking
    the merits of an underlying criminal conviction.” Echeverria v.
    State, 
    949 So. 2d 331
    , 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). A challenge to
    the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be raised in any kind of
    collateral postconviction motion. See Smith v. State, 
    41 So. 3d 1037
    , 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“[C]laims of insufficient evidence
    have long been held to be procedurally barred in collateral
    proceedings.”). The trial court was therefore correct to dismiss
    the rule 3.800(a) motion.
    Furthermore, even if Appellant was correct and he was
    guilty of only attempted escape, an attempt to escape from lawful
    confinement satisfies that element of the crime of escape. See
    Keel v. State, 
    438 So. 2d 850
     (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Fla. Std. Jury
    Instr. (Crim.) 27.1. Escape, whether attempted or completed, is a
    second degree felony under section 944.40, punishable by up to
    fifteen years in prison pursuant to section 775.082(3)(c), Florida
    Statutes (2010). Appellant’s fifteen year sentence was lawful.
    AFFIRMED.
    B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.
    _____________________________
    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
    _____________________________
    Edwardo De Juan, pro se, Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-0105

Citation Numbers: 249 So. 3d 681

Filed Date: 4/30/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/30/2018