Dyck-O'Neal v. Germany , 236 So. 3d 1194 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FIFTH DISTRICT
    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.,
    Appellant,
    v.                                                     Case No. 5D17-1059
    ROBERT GERMANY AND LINDA K.
    PLANT-GERMANY,
    Appellees.
    ________________________________/
    Opinion filed February 23, 2018
    Appeal from the Circuit Court
    for Putnam County,
    Scott C. Dupont, Judge.
    David M. Snyder, of David M Snyder, PA,
    Tampa, Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices
    of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa, and
    Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel
    C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
    Douglas N. Burnett, and M. Aaron Dukes,
    St. Johns Law Group, St. Augustine, for
    Appellee Linda K. Carroll.
    No appearance for other Appellee.
    EDWARDS, J.
    Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. (“DONI”) appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of
    Appellee, Linda Carroll f/k/a Linda K. Plant-Germany. DONI correctly argues that the trial
    court erred in finding DONI’s action time-barred. See Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc., 
    906 So. 2d 343
    , 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that the statute of limitations to seek a
    deficiency judgment does not begin to run until after the entry of foreclosure judgment
    and subsequent foreclosure sale). We also decline Appellee’s suggestion that we affirm
    the final summary judgment based on a ground that she did not raise below. See Trainor
    v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 
    211 So. 3d 366
    , 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).1
    Therefore, we reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of Appellee and
    remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We also deny Appellee’s
    motion for attorney’s fees.
    REVERSED AND REMANDED.
    PALMER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
    1 Kinney v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 
    165 So. 3d 691
    (Fla. 2015),
    is inapplicable to this case; thus, Appellee should not have offered it as a legal basis for
    summary judgment, and the trial court erred in relying upon it.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 5D17-1059

Citation Numbers: 236 So. 3d 1194

Filed Date: 2/19/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2018