DESMOND F. BALLARD AND NILES B. WHITTEN v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    DESMOND BALLARD and NILES B.                 )
    WHITTEN,                                     )
    )
    Appellants,                    )
    )
    v.                                           )          Case No. 2D17-1425
    )
    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,                       )
    )
    Appellee.                      )
    )
    Opinion filed August 1, 2018.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas
    County; Cynthia Newton, Judge.
    Niles B. Whitten, Gainesville, for
    Appellants.
    Jacqueline Costoya of Kelley Kronenberg,
    Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Desmond Ballard seeks review of orders that effectuated several rulings
    concerning discovery disputes, sanctions, and a judicial default in the course of a civil
    proceeding. With respect to the circuit court's rulings on the contested discovery issues
    and judicial default, these are nonappealable, nonfinal orders, and so we cannot
    exercise our appellate jurisdiction to consider them. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130; Hitt v.
    Homes & Land Brokers, Inc., 
    993 So. 2d 1162
    , 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ("[T]he list of
    appealable nonfinal orders in [rule 9.130] is intended to be exhaustive."). We also
    conclude that the discovery and default rulings are not reviewable through certiorari.
    See Capital One, N.A. v. Forbes, 
    34 So. 3d 209
    , 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); First
    Paradee, Ltd. v. Jones, 
    828 So. 2d 483
    , 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we
    dismiss the appeal as it pertains to those rulings. With respect to the portion of the
    order that imposes sanctions in the total amount of $11,728.67 to be paid within thirty
    days from the entry of the circuit court's order, we do have jurisdiction to review that
    ruling and affirm it without comment. See Burt v. SP Healthcare Holdings, LLC, 
    163 So. 3d 1274
    , 1276-77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Griffith v. Ramzey's A Plus, Inc., 
    186 So. 3d 629
    ,
    630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); J.P. Morgan Chase Bank v. Combee, 
    883 So. 2d 330
    , 331
    (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
    Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
    KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1425

Filed Date: 8/1/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2018