Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Simoneau , 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5551 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE                  )
    CORPORATION,                                 )
    )
    Appellant,                     )
    )
    v.                                           )       Case No. 2D14-4183
    )
    NIURKA SIMONEAU and JORGE L.                 )
    PEREZ,                                       )
    )
    Appellees.                     )
    )
    Opinion filed April 13, 2016.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for
    Hillsborough County; Bernard C. Silver,
    Judge.
    Kara Berard Rockenbach and Lauren J.
    Smith of Methe & Rockenbach, P.A.,
    West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
    Aaron S. Kling of Smith, Kling &
    Thompson, P.A., for Appellees.
    CRENSHAW, Judge.
    Citizens Property Insurance Corporation challenges a final judgment for
    money damages entered in favor of its insureds, Niurka Simoneau and Jorge L. Perez,
    following a jury trial after Citizens conceded the existence of sinkhole activity—a
    covered loss under the insurance contract—but disputed the necessary method of
    subsurface repair. In the sole issue on appeal, Citizens argues that the trial court erred
    in denying its motion to require the insureds to enter into a contract for subsurface
    repairs before entering a money judgment. We agree. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v.
    Amat, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D448, D450 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 19, 2016) ("Based on the jury's
    finding of coverage, the trial court was obligated to enforce the contract, including the
    policy's restrictions on Citizens' obligations to pay for the cost of the repair for
    subsurface damages."); see also Tower Hill Select Ins. Co. v. McKee, 
    151 So. 3d 2
    , 4
    (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("Because the insurance policy contained a loss settlement
    provision tracking the language of section 627.707(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), Tower
    Hill had the authority to withhold payment for subsurface repairs until McKee entered
    into a contract for those repairs."), reh'g granted (Oct. 27, 2014), review denied, 
    163 So. 3d
    511 (Fla. 2015). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment to the extent that it
    awarded money damages for subsurface repairs without requiring the insureds to enter
    into a contract for those repairs. We affirm the final judgment in all other respects.
    Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
    SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D14-4183

Citation Numbers: 197 So. 3d 70, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5551, 2016 WL 1450317

Judges: Crenshaw, Silberman, Black

Filed Date: 4/13/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024