David Lawton Petty v. State of Florida , 263 So. 3d 307 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    STATE OF FLORIDA
    _____________________________
    No. 1D18-3686
    _____________________________
    DAVID LAWTON PETTY,
    Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________
    On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.
    Robert M. Foster, Judge.
    March 4, 2019
    BILBREY, J.
    Appellant, David Lawton Petty, challenges the trial court
    order finding him in indirect criminal contempt and imposing a
    ten-day jail sentence. We affirm the order finding him in
    contempt but reverse for resentencing in accordance with rule
    3.840(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
    Rule 3.840(g) requires that prior to the pronouncement of
    sentence for indirect criminal contempt, the court “inform the
    defendant of the accusation and judgment,” “inquire as to
    whether the defendant has any cause to show why sentence
    should not be pronounced,” and afford the defendant “the
    opportunity to present evidence of mitigating circumstances.” In
    addition, the sentence must be pronounced “in open court and in
    the presence of the defendant.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.840(g). The
    trial court did not comply with these requirements, and the
    failure to comply with rule 3.840(g) is fundamental error. Gooden
    v. State, 
    931 So. 2d 146
    (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); see also Ensign v.
    State, 
    67 So. 3d 353
    (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
    The order finding Appellant in willful contempt of court is
    affirmed, but the sentence imposed is reversed pursuant to
    Gooden. This cause is remanded for resentencing compliant with
    rule 3.840(g).
    AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
    ROWE and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
    _____________________________
    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331. Such a motion must be filed on or before
    March 7, 2019. In absence of such motion by that
    date, the Clerk shall issue the mandate thereafter
    forthwith. Any response to such motion may be
    filed on or before March 13, 2019.
    _____________________________
    Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant
    Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-3686

Citation Numbers: 263 So. 3d 307

Filed Date: 3/4/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/4/2019