Snitcovsky v. Sangerman ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •   Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed December 5, 2018.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D17-2762
    Lower Tribunal No. 13-22252
    ________________
    Susan Snitcovsky,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Craig Sangerman,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rodolfo A.
    Ruiz, Judge.
    Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for
    appellant.
    Egozi & Bennett, P.A., and Bernard L. Egozi and Isaac S. Lew, for appellee.
    Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Finding there was no issue of material fact regarding Appellant’s defenses,
    we affirm the summary judgment under review. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass’n v.
    Robbins, 
    914 So. 2d 925
    , 928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further
    review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the
    specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of
    that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”) (citations and quotations
    omitted); Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank, 
    143 So. 3d 489
    , 490 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
    (Borrower’s affidavit of non-receipt of default notice did not create genuine issue
    of material fact preventing summary judgment where note required only that notice
    be mailed and undisputed affidavit established notice was mailed); Parra de Rey v.
    Rey, 
    114 So. 3d 371
    , 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (upholding summary judgment
    where party failed to establish material issue of fact regarding defense of duress).
    Affirmed.
    2