Rumlin v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    JASON CHAD RUMLIN,                  )
    )
    Appellant,               )
    )
    v.                                  )                  Case No. 2D15-457
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                   )
    )
    Appellee.                )
    ___________________________________ )
    Opinion filed August 5, 2016.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for
    Hillsborough County; Kimberly K.
    Fernandez, Judge.
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,
    and Carol J. Y. Wilson, Assistant Public
    Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Jason Chad Rumlin, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    SILBERMAN, Judge.
    Jason Chad Rumlin seeks review of his judgments and sentences in two
    separate cases for two counts of delivery of a controlled substance within 1000 feet of a
    place of worship and one count of possession of a controlled substance. Rumlin
    entered open pleas to the charges, and the court imposed concurrent sentences of
    44.25 months in prison. Counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and Rumlin filed a pro se brief. We affirm because the record does not
    reflect reversible error.
    We note that Rumlin filed a pro se motion to correct sentencing error while
    this appeal was pending pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).
    However, this motion was untimely because it was served after Rumlin served his pro
    se brief. See 
    id. Our record
    reflects that the trial court has not entered a written order
    on the motion. However, we note that any such order would be a nullity because of the
    untimeliness of the motion. See State v. Hodges, 
    151 So. 3d 531
    , 534 (Fla. 3d DCA
    2014). We express no opinion on the merits of Rumlin's rule 3.800(b)(2) motion and
    affirm without prejudice to any right he may have to file a motion for postconviction
    relief.
    Affirmed.
    CRENSHAW and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D15-457

Judges: Silberman, Crenshaw, Badalamenti

Filed Date: 8/5/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024