State v. Johnson ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                )
    )
    Appellant,            )
    )
    v.                               )                   Case No.    2D15-3043
    )
    DARIUS Q. JOHNSON,               )
    )
    Appellee.             )
    ________________________________ )
    Opinion filed August 17, 2016.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for
    Manatee County; Deno G. Economou,
    Judge.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs
    Cline, Assistant Attorney General,
    Tampa, for Appellant.
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,
    and Brooke Elvington, Assistant Public
    Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.
    KELLY, Judge.
    The State appeals from the downward departure sentence imposed on
    Darius Q. Johnson following his nolo contendere plea to uttering a counterfeit
    instrument. We reverse because the trial court's reasons for departure from the
    recommended guidelines sentence are not supported by competent, substantial
    evidence.
    Johnson's recommended guidelines sentence was 119 months in state
    prison.1 The prosecutor requested that the court impose the guidelines sentence
    because Johnson's prior record consisted of serious offenses, for which he served
    twenty years, and the charged offense occurred only two years after his release from
    prison. Defense counsel represented to the court that departure was warranted
    because Johnson received no financial benefit from the offense and an uncharged
    ringleader coordinated the offense in a larger criminal enterprise and provided Johnson
    with the fraudulent check. Defense counsel also asked that Johnson receive a
    sentence that would enable him to keep his job. The court, relying on defense counsel's
    argument, offered Johnson two years of probation on the basis of section
    921.0026(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), which states that "[t]he defendant was an
    accomplice to the offense and was a relatively minor participant in the criminal conduct."
    The State objected to the imposition of a nonstate prison sanction and requested a "full-
    fledged" sentencing hearing because of the unsubstantiated statements by Johnson
    and defense counsel. The court acknowledged the State's position, but continued with
    the plea colloquy and the imposition of the departure sentence.
    A trial court must impose a guidelines sentence unless the court finds that
    competent, substantial evidence supports a valid reason for departure. State v.
    Henderson, 
    766 So. 2d 389
    , 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). It is the defendant's burden to
    The Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet does not appear in the record.
    1
    However, the prosecutor recited its contents and defense counsel raised no objection.
    -2-
    prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a valid reason to depart exists. State v.
    Sawyer, 
    753 So. 2d 737
    , 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
    No testimony or evidence was presented to support the assertion that
    Johnson was a minor participant in the offense. As the State argues, defense counsel's
    arguments are not evidence. See State v. Pinckney, 
    173 So. 3d 1139
    , 1140 (Fla. 2d
    DCA 2015) (noting that the arguments of counsel are not evidence); State v. Bernard,
    
    744 So. 2d 1134
    , 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) ("[R]epresentations of an attorney alone are
    insufficient to form a valid basis for departure."); State v. Silver, 
    723 So. 2d 381
    , 382-83
    (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that defense counsel's assertion without supporting
    evidence was insufficient to establish that the defendant was a minor participant in the
    offense). The undisputed facts before the court were that Johnson went to the bank
    and attempted to cash a fraudulent check. He did not "receive a financial benefit" only
    because the bank teller refused to cash the check. These facts, even if proven, do not
    support the reasons for departure.
    Therefore, we reverse Johnson's sentence and remand for a new hearing
    where Johnson shall be permitted to withdraw his plea. See State v. Teal, 
    831 So. 2d 1254
    , 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that the defendant should be given the
    opportunity to withdraw his plea because the sentence was the result of an agreement
    induced by the trial court). If Johnson declines the opportunity to withdraw his plea, the
    sentencing court must impose a guidelines sentence. See State v. Licea, 
    707 So. 2d 1155
    , 1157 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
    Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
    NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D15-3043

Judges: Kelly, Northcutt, Khouzam

Filed Date: 8/17/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024