Haas v. Fox ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed November 19, 2014.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D13-2424
    Lower Tribunal No. 11-39508
    ________________
    Haas Automation, Inc., etc.,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Dr. Robert Fox, Helene Fox, Dr. Steven Fox, Sherri Fox, and Fisher
    Auction Company, Inc.,
    Appellees.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beth Bloom,
    Judge.
    Kopelowitz Ostrow and John J. Shahady and Thomas R. Shahady (Fort
    Lauderdale); Douglas Paul Solomon (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
    Isicoff, Ragatz & Koenigsberg and Eric D. Isicoff and Christopher M.
    Yannuzzi, for appellees Dr. Robert Fox, Helene Fox, Dr. Steven Fox, and Sherri
    Fox; Marshall Socarras Grant, P.L., and Ruben E. Socarras (Boca Raton), for
    appellee Fisher Auction Company, Inc.
    Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Haas Automation, Inc. (“Haas”) appeals an order granting final summary
    judgment in favor of Dr. Robert Fox, Helene Fox, Dr. Steven Fox, Sheri Fox, and
    Fisher Auction Company, Inc. (collectively the Appellees). We reverse.
    A review of the record reveals that genuine issues of material fact remain
    unresolved that preclude entry of summary judgment including the Bid
    Acknowledgement and Receipt for Deposit form, which lists the total percentage
    of the Buyer’s Premium as $620,000 and the total contract price as $6,820,000.
    Because these factual issues should be resolved by a jury, summary judgment was
    improper. See Fla. Marlins Baseball Club, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s
    London Subscribing to Policy No. 893/HC/97/9096, 
    979 So. 2d 429
    (Fla. 3d DCA
    2008); Giardina v. Bowe, 
    680 So. 2d 1071
    (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). “Where there is
    room for rational difference of opinion as to the existence of evidentiary facts from
    which an ultimate factual conclusion is sought to be established, the court should
    submit the case to the jury.” 47th St. Serv. Station, Inc. v. Campos, 
    595 So. 2d 229
    , 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
    Accordingly, we reverse the entry of summary judgment in favor of the
    Appellees.
    REVERSED AND REMANDED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-2424

Filed Date: 11/19/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/19/2014