Robert J. Bogdanoff v. Broken Sound Club, Inc. , 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19684 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •         DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    July Term 2014
    ROBERT J. BOGDANOFF,
    Appellant,
    v.
    BROKEN SOUND CLUB, INC.,
    Appellee.
    No. 4D13-3124
    [December 3, 2014]
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
    Beach  County;     Reginald   Corlew,     Judge;    L.T.   Case     Nos.
    2008CC013934XXXXSB and 2012CA014269XXXXMB.
    Shane M. Farnsworth of Shane M. Farnsworth, P.A., Delray Beach, for
    appellant.
    Dale W. Schley, II, of Laing & Weicholz, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellant Robert J. Bogdanoff appeals the final order of summary
    judgment entered against him and in favor of Appellee Broken Sound Club,
    Inc. (“Broken Sound”) on its complaint to recover delinquent dues and fees
    from Appellant’s membership in Broken Sound Club. Appellant also
    appeals the order granting Broken Sound’s motion to transfer the cause
    from county court to circuit court, the order granting Broken Sound’s
    motion to dismiss his counterclaim, and the denial of his motion to
    disqualify a judge. We find no error in the trial court’s decisions below
    and, therefore, affirm the final judgment without further comment except
    as to the issue of the transfer of the case from county court to circuit court.
    Appellant maintains that the transfer of his case to the circuit court
    was improper because Broken Sound’s complaint only alleged the
    jurisdictional limits of the county court and no amended complaint was
    filed, leaving the circuit court without subject matter jurisdiction to hear
    the case. We review the question of subject matter jurisdiction de novo.
    Sanchez v. Fernandez, 
    915 So. 2d 192
    , 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
    The parties correctly assert that a court’s subject matter jurisdiction
    over a case generally depends on the good-faith allegations in the
    complaint as to an amount in controversy. See Wendler v. City of St.
    Augustine, 
    108 So. 3d 1141
    , 1143 n.3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). While
    recognizing this, the Florida Supreme Court has stated that the test is
    twofold and held that, “notwithstanding the bona fides of the plaintiff’s
    demand at the time of institution of suit, as a matter of judicial power the
    county court is precluded from entering a judgment for damages in excess
    of its mandated jurisdiction.” White v. Marine Transp. Lines, Inc., 
    372 So. 2d
    81, 84 (Fla. 1979). Since 1992, the county court has had jurisdiction
    to hear matters in controversy not exceeding $15,000. § 34.01(1)(c), Fla.
    Stat. (2012).
    In our instant case, transfer of the cause was proper where the amount
    owed by Appellant to Broken Sound continued to accrue over the years of
    pending litigation and the county court would have been precluded from
    entering a final judgment as to the correct amount owed, which exceeded
    $15,000. While Appellant does not challenge the jurisdictional limitation
    of the county or circuit court, he asserts that Broken Sound’s failure to
    amend the original complaint to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of
    the circuit court deprives the circuit court of that jurisdiction.
    “If it should appear at any time that an action is pending in the wrong
    court of any county, it may be transferred to the proper court within said
    county by the same method as provided in rule 1.170(j).” Fla. R. Civ. P.
    1.060(a). Rule 1.170(j), governing transfers of actions when counterclaims
    and crossclaims are added to make the demand exceed the jurisdictional
    limitation of a court, notes that the transfer should occur “with only such
    alterations in the pleadings as are essential.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.170(j). What
    is essential to a pleading is what is necessary to put the other party on
    notice of what is to be tried and claimed for relief. See Fla. R. Civ. P.
    1.110(b); Brown v. Gardens by the Sea S. Condo. Ass’n, 
    424 So. 2d 181
    ,
    183 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
    Whereas the allegations in the complaint were sufficient to put
    Appellant on notice that monthly dues and fees would continue to accrue
    after the filing of the complaint, it was not essential for Broken Sound to
    amend the complaint to reflect such accrual. We therefore hold that no
    amended complaint is required to allege the jurisdictional limits of the
    circuit court when transferring a cause from the county court where the
    transfer is necessary to allow a plaintiff to obtain full relief relating to fees
    and assessments originally pled that continue to accrue while litigation is
    pending.
    2
    Affirmed.
    CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
    *        *      *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 4D13-3124

Citation Numbers: 154 So. 3d 410, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19684, 2014 WL 6775259

Judges: Ciklin, Conner, Forst, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/3/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024