Garcia v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    SONNY GARCIA,                                 )
    )
    Appellant,                      )
    )
    v.                                            )            Case No. 2D13-6251
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                             )
    )
    Appellee.                          )
    ________________________________              )
    Opinion filed December 3, 2014.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County;
    Edward J. Volz, Jr., Judge.
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
    Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public
    Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for
    Appellee.
    MORRIS, Judge.
    Sonny Garcia appeals the revocation of his sex offender probation for the
    offense of possession of child pornography and his resulting sentence of forty-eight
    months in prison. We affirm the revocation of his probation because there was
    competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that Garcia
    "intentional[ly] disregard[ed] . . . the GPS monitoring rules," constituting a willful and
    substantial violation of probation. Correa v. State, 
    43 So. 3d 738
    , 745 (Fla. 2d DCA
    2010) (noting that "noncompliance with the rules [that] results from equipment problems
    or the subject's unintentional failure to operate the equipment properly . . . does not rise
    to the level of a willful and substantial violation of probation" but that "intentional
    disregard of the GPS monitoring rules, tampering with the equipment, or actual
    violations of curfew or other activity restrictions will generally amount to willful and
    substantial violations"); see also State v. Carter, 
    835 So. 2d 259
    , 262 (Fla. 2002) ("The
    trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator's motive, intent, and
    attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.").
    Affirmed.
    DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE, J., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D13-6251

Judges: Morris, Davis, Larose

Filed Date: 12/3/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024