Jerry Gallion v. State of Florida , 154 So. 3d 1149 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    JERRY GALLION,                          NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    Appellant,                        DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    v.                                      CASE NO. 1D13-2905
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________/
    Opinion filed December 9, 2014.
    An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
    Mallory D. Cooper, Judge.
    Jerry Gallion, pro se, Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney
    General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellant, Jerry Gallion, appeals an order denying his postconviction relief
    motion which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We
    find no error in the trial court’s denial of relief as to Grounds 1, 3, and 6 following
    an evidentiary hearing.     However, because the trial court summarily denied
    Grounds 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 without attaching portions of the record conclusively
    refuting the claims, a fact acknowledged by the State, we reverse and remand with
    instructions that the court either attach such portions of the record or hold an
    evidentiary hearing on the claims. See Wainwright v. State, 
    896 So. 2d 695
    , 698
    (Fla. 2004) (noting that a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a
    postconviction relief claim unless the motion and record conclusively show that he
    or she is entitled to no relief or where the claim is legally insufficient); Simmons v.
    State, 
    66 So. 3d 327
    , 327-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (reversing for record attachments
    or for an evidentiary hearing where the trial court failed to assemble a record from
    which it could be conclusively determined that the appellant was not entitled to any
    relief on his facially sufficient rule 3.850 claim); Washington v. State, 
    10 So. 3d 1126
    , 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“If the postconviction defendant’s claims are
    legally sufficient, the trial court must attach portions of the record that conclusively
    refute the claims.”).
    AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with
    instructions.
    LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1D13-2905

Citation Numbers: 154 So. 3d 1149

Judges: Lewis, Van Nortwick Swanson

Filed Date: 12/11/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024