Alfredo Martinez v. Leslie Izquierdo ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •         DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    ALFREDO MARTINEZ,
    Appellant,
    v.
    LESLIE IZQUIERDO,
    Appellee.
    No. 4D14-4501
    [June 17, 2015]
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
    Broward County; Laura M. Watson, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE-14-7453.
    Blanca Rosa Sordo of Martinez and Sordo, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
    Leslie Izquierdo, Pembroke Pines, pro se.
    DAMOORGIAN, C.J.
    Alfredo Martinez appeals from the trial court’s final judgment of
    injunction for protection against domestic violence with minor child in
    favor of Leslie Izquierdo. Having reviewed the record, we hold that the
    evidence was sufficient to establish that Ms. Izquierdo had an objectively
    reasonable cause to believe that she was in imminent danger of becoming
    the victim of an act of domestic violence and, therefore, affirm the court’s
    entry of the injunction. See Abravaya v. Gonzalez, 
    734 So. 2d 577
     (Fla.
    3d DCA 1999); § 741.30(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013).
    However, in issuing the injunction, the court required Mr. Martinez to
    surrender all of his ammunition and firearms in accordance with section
    790.233(1) of the Florida Statutes which provides, in pertinent part, that
    “[a] person may not have in his or her care, custody, possession, or control
    any firearm or ammunition if the person has been issued a final injunction
    that is currently in force and effect, restraining that person from
    committing acts of domestic violence . . . .” § 790.233(1), Fla. Stat. (2013).
    This was erroneous as Mr. Martinez is a law enforcement officer and
    section 790.233(1) “does not apply to a state or local officer as defined in
    s. 943.10(14),1 holding an active certification, who receives or possesses a
    firearm or ammunition for use in performing official duties on behalf of the
    officer’s employing agency, unless otherwise prohibited by the employing
    agency.” § 790.233(3), Fla. Stat. (2013).
    Accordingly, we affirm the court’s entry of the underlying injunction,
    but reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court remove the
    provision of the injunction requiring Mr. Martinez to surrender all of his
    ammunition and firearms based on his status as a law enforcement officer.
    We note that the exemption found in section 790.233(3) only applies to
    “firearm[s] or ammunition for use in performing official duties on behalf of
    the officer’s employing agency,” and therefore our instructions are without
    prejudice for the trial court to provide limitations on any personal firearms
    or ammunition in Mr. Martinez’s possession.
    Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
    TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
    *         *         *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    1   Section 943.10(14) defines an “officer” as “any person employed or
    appointed as a full-time, part-time, or auxiliary law enforcement officer,
    correctional officer, or correctional probation officer.” § 943.10(14), Fla. Stat.
    (2013).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 4D14-4501

Judges: Damoorgian, Taylor

Filed Date: 6/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024