GLENWOOD HUNTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    GLENWOOD HUNTER, DOC #360293,                )
    )
    Appellant,                      )
    )
    v.                                           )        Case No. 2D18-784
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                            )
    )
    Appellee.                       )
    )
    Opinion filed June 7, 2019.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk
    County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge.
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
    Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender,
    Bartow, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for
    Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Glenwood Hunter appeals his judgment and sentence for one count of
    sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school. Finding merit in arguments he raised in a
    motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
    3.800(b)(2), we reverse and remand for the trial court to correct the following errors in
    Mr. Hunter's monetary obligations order.
    The monetary obligations order includes a mandatory cost of $15 imposed
    under section 938.13, Florida Statutes (2017), for misdemeanors involving drugs or
    alcohol. This cost was not orally imposed at sentencing, see Peacock v. State, 
    44 Fla. L
    . Weekly D929a, D929a (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 10, 2019), and, as Mr. Hunter was
    convicted of a felony, it would nevertheless be inapplicable. On remand, this cost must
    be stricken "so that the written sentences reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement on
    said costs." 
    Id. The trial
    court orally imposed $163.90 in investigative costs. However, the
    written monetary obligations order imposes investigative costs of $163.92. "[T]he oral
    pronouncement of sentence controls over a written sentence." Blocker v. State, 
    968 So. 2d
    686, 690 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citing Williams v. State, 
    957 So. 2d 600
    , 603 (Fla.
    2007)). On remand, this cost must be corrected.
    We affirm Mr. Hunter's judgment and sentence in all other respects.
    Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.
    NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-0784

Filed Date: 6/7/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/8/2019