Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 19, 2018.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-875
Lower Tribunal No. 15-16487
________________
Progressive Waste Solutions of FL., Inc.,
Appellant,
vs.
Tavares Britt,
Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.
Baker & Hostetler LLP, and Robert W. Thielhelm, Jr., and Robert D. Sowell
(Orlando), for appellant.
Goldberg and Hirsh, P.A., and Jeffrey S. Hirsh; Akerman LLP, and Gerald
B. Cope, Jr., Michael B. Chavies, Ilana Tabacinic, and Naim S. Surgeon; Payer &
Associates, and James D. Payer, for appellee.
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Given the actual notice Appellant received of the pending lawsuit
and various critical proceedings therein, including the notice of trial, and the fact
that there was no contact between Appellant and Appellee’s counsel regarding
Appellant’s claim against Appellee, we find this case clearly distinguishable from
M.W. v. SPCP Group V, LLC,
163 So. 3d 518, 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), and
affirm because the judgment was therefore not void under the authority of Bank of
New York Mellon v. Condominium Association of La Mer Estates, Inc.,
175 So.
3d 282, 285 (Fla. 2015) (quoting Curbelo v. Ullman,
571 So. 2d 443, 445 (Fla.
1990) (“It is well settled that where a court is legally organized and has jurisdiction
of the subject matter and the adverse parties are given an opportunity to be heard,
then errors, irregularities or wrongdoing in proceedings, short of illegal deprivation
of opportunity to be heard, will not render the judgment void.”)).
2
