Elias v. State , 257 So. 3d 1248 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •            CJnrb Burtrtct Court of
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed .     DEC 2 0 2018
    Not final until disposition of timoly filed motion for rehearing.
    No. 18-2532
    Lower Tribunal No. 18-1804
    Alvaro Elias,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    The State of Florida,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Diane V. Ward,
    Judge.
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant
    Public Defender, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken,
    Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.
    ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING POST-TRIAL RELEASE
    PER CURIAM.
    Alvaro Elias seeks review of the trial court's denial of Elias's Florida Rule of
    Criminal Procedure 3.190(b) motion for post-trial release pending review of his
    conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction. SeeFla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). In
    denying Elias's motion for post-trial release, the trial court was required to enter a
    written order setting forth the factual basis on which the court reached its decision
    and the reasons for its denial.    See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691 (b); Fla. R. App. P.
    9.140(h)(3). The lower court committed reversible error in failing to enter such a
    written order.   See Metayer v. State, 
    52 So. 3d 691
    , 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010);
    Montgomery v. State, 
    788 So. 2d 274
    , 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Buckhalter v. State,
    
    416 So. 2d 862
    , 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, we grant Elias's motion for
    review, reverse the denial of Elias's motion for post-trial release, and remand for the
    lower court to reconsider Elias's motion in accordance with the applicable criminal
    and appellate rules within three days of the date of this opinion. If the lower court
    again denies post-trial release, it must make the necessary written findings to support
    the denial.
    Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-2532

Citation Numbers: 257 So. 3d 1248

Filed Date: 12/20/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/20/2018