INDASIA UNDERWOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA , 272 So. 3d 858 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    INDASIA UNDERWOOD,                           )
    )
    Appellant,                      )
    )
    v.                                           )         Case No. 2D17-4525
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                            )
    )
    Appellee.                       )
    )
    Opinion filed May 24, 2019.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk
    County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,
    and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant
    Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    CASANUEVA, Judge.
    In this Anders1 appeal, Indasia Underwood appeals an order of revocation
    of community control and a judgment and sentence for one count of unlawful
    possession of the personal identification information of another (five or more). We
    affirm the judgment, sentence, and order of revocation without comment.
    1Anders   v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967).
    After sentencing, Ms. Underwood filed a pro se motion for mitigation and
    reduction of sentence and subsequently filed a pro se notice of appeal. After the notice
    of appeal was filed, the trial court entered an order denying the motion for mitigation and
    reduction of sentence. The trial court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion
    after the notice of appeal was filed. See Othouse v. State, 
    912 So. 2d 682
    , 682 (Fla. 2d
    DCA 2005). The trial court should have dismissed the motion rather than deny it. See
    Hawthorne v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 292
    , 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("Because the filing of a
    notice of appeal divests the trial court of jurisdiction, the trial court should have
    dismissed the motion on that basis instead of denying it."). Accordingly, we remand for
    the trial court to vacate the order denying the motion for mitigation and reduction of
    sentence and enter an order dismissing the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Our
    affirmance is without prejudice to any right Ms. Underwood may have to raise this issue
    in a timely motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(c).
    Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
    VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-4525

Citation Numbers: 272 So. 3d 858

Filed Date: 5/24/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/24/2019