Dontrevius Byron v. State , 241 So. 3d 271 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FIFTH DISTRICT
    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    DONTREVIUS BYRON,
    Appellant,
    v.                                                       Case No. 5D17-3724
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    ________________________________/
    Opinion filed April 20, 2018
    3.850 Appeal from the Circuit
    Court for Brevard County,
    Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge.
    Dontrevius Byron, Jasper, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed
    pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging three grounds for
    relief. We find that the record does not conclusively refute part of Appellant’s first ground
    for relief. As part of ground one, Appellant claims that trial counsel told him that he would
    not be sentenced to a longer sentence than his codefendants. Although the written plea
    form was attached to the postconviction court's order,1 its standard language, stating, "No
    person has made any promises to me that induced me to enter this plea," is insufficient
    to refute Appellant’s claim of affirmative misadvice. "[A] general question about promises
    made in exchange for a plea is insufficient to refute an allegation of specific misadvice by
    counsel about the length of a sentence." Collazo v. State, 
    8 So. 3d 1273
    , 1274 (Fla. 5th
    DCA 2009) (citations omitted); see Lamkin v. State, 
    215 So. 3d 640
    , 641 (Fla. 5th DCA
    2017); Ostane v. State, 
    73 So. 3d 335
    , 335 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we reverse
    the summary denial of this portion of ground one and remand for the postconviction court
    to either attach additional portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or hold
    an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the summary denial as to the remainder of Appellant’s
    ground one as well as grounds two and three in their entirety.
    AFFIRMED in Part; REVERSED in Part, and REMANDED for Further
    Proceedings.
    ORFINGER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
    1   We note that the plea colloquy transcript was not included in the record.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 5D17-3724

Citation Numbers: 241 So. 3d 271

Filed Date: 4/16/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/27/2018