Edwards v. State , 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2304 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    LEONARD EDWARDS,                   )
    )
    Appellant,              )
    )
    v.                                 )              Case No. 2D15-5724
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
    )
    Appellee.               )
    ___________________________________)
    Opinion filed February 22, 2017.
    Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
    9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court
    for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber,
    Judge.
    PER CURIAM.
    Leonard Edwards appeals the order summarily denying his motion for
    postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2). We
    reverse and remand for resentencing.
    A jury convicted Edwards of rape in 1972, and the trial court sentenced
    him to life imprisonment. Edwards alleged in his sworn rule 3.850 motion that because
    he was sixteen years old when he committed his crime, his life sentence is illegal under
    Miller v. Alabama, 
    132 S. Ct. 2455
    (2012), and Horsley v. State, 
    160 So. 3d 393
    (Fla.
    2015). Relying on McPherson v. State, 
    138 So. 3d 1201
    , 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), and
    Atwell v. State, 
    128 So. 3d 167
    , 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), the postconviction court
    denied the motion because Edwards' life sentence did not exclude the possibility of
    parole. Both of those cases held that Miller was inapplicable to juveniles who were
    sentenced to life in prison with parole eligibility after a term of years.
    While this appeal was pending, the Florida Supreme Court quashed
    Atwell, holding that "Florida's existing parole system, as set forth by statute, does not
    provide for individualized consideration of Atwell's juvenile status at the time of the
    murder, as required by Miller, and that his sentence, which is virtually indistinguishable
    from a sentence of life without parole, is therefore unconstitutional." Atwell v. State, 
    197 So. 3d 1040
    , 1041 (Fla. 2016). The court held that juveniles sentenced to life with the
    possibility of parole are entitled to resentencing in conformance with sections 775.082,
    921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2016). 
    Id. at 1042-1043
    (citing Horsley v.
    State, 
    160 So. 3d 393
    , 395 (Fla. 2015)). See also McPherson v. State, 
    41 Fla. L
    .
    Weekly S578 (Fla. Oct. 28, 2016) (quashing this court's decision, with instructions to
    remand to the trial court for resentencing). Following Atwell, this court recently held that
    a juvenile who was sentenced to life imprisonment with parole eligibility after twenty-five
    years was entitled to be resentenced under sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402,
    Florida Statutes. See Landy v. State, 
    41 Fla. L
    . Weekly D2555 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18,
    2016).
    Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Edwards' motion and remand
    for resentencing in conformance with sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402,
    Florida Statutes.
    -2-
    Reversed and remanded.
    NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Case 2D15-5724

Citation Numbers: 210 So. 3d 266, 2017 WL 685617, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2304

Judges: Northcutt, Khouzam, Rothstein-Youakim

Filed Date: 2/22/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024