ANANIAS WESTBROOK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •       Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed March 1, 2023.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D22-1419
    Lower Tribunal No. F93-14423
    ________________
    Ananias Westbrook,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    The State of Florida,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto
    Milian, Judge.
    Ananias Westbrook, in proper person.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
    On January 11, 2023, the Court affirmed the denial of Ananias
    Westbrook’s appeal from a trial court order imposing sanctions and barring
    appellant from filing any further pro se motions. On the same date, the Court
    ordered Westbrook to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing
    further pro se appeals, petitions, motions, or other pleadings in this Court
    relating to lower tribunal case F93-14423.
    Upon consideration of Westbrook’s response to the order to show
    cause and the successive, duplicative, pro se petitions and appeals brought
    by Westbrook, we conclude that good cause has not been shown. Westbrook
    has engaged in the filing of meritless, frivolous, and successive claims,
    continuing to seek relief from this Court notwithstanding prior adverse
    determinations on the merits and warnings from this court. See Westbrook
    v. State, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D130a (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 11, 2023); and
    Westbrook v. State, 
    149 So. 3d 723
     (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
    In accordance with Jimenez v. State, 
    196 So. 3d 499
     (Fla. 3d DCA
    2016), State v. Spencer, 
    751 So. 2d 47
     (Fla. 1999), and Concepcion v. State,
    
    944 So. 2d 1069
     (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), Westbrook is prohibited from filing any
    further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions, or petitions relating to his
    conviction, judgment, and sentence in lower tribunal case F93-14423. We
    direct the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal to refuse to accept any
    2
    such papers relating to the circuit court case number unless they have been
    reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The
    Florida Bar in good standing. See Whipple v. State, 
    112 So. 3d 540
     (Fla. 3d
    DCA 2013).
    Additionally, any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by
    Westbrook may subject him to appropriate sanctions, including the issuance
    of written findings forwarded to the Department of Corrections for its
    consideration of disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time. See
    § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2014).
    3