boynton-whitworth-farms-llc-etc-j-dudley-parker-john-f-mcreynolds ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    BOYNTON-WHITWORTH FARMS, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability
    company, J. DUDLEY PARKER, JOHN F. McREYNOLDS, DENNIS C.
    GRASS and CHARLES F. McREYNOLDS,
    Appellants,
    v.
    CADENCE BANK, N.A. f/k/a SUPERIOR BANK, N.A., PGM
    PROPERTIES, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, ANNAM
    CORP., a Florida corporation, LEE DUONG, individually, GEN-X
    CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, and all other unknown
    parties claiming by, through or under named appellees,
    Appellees.
    No. 4D13-4731
    [ April 15, 2015 ]
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
    Beach   County;    David    F.    Crow,    Judge;    L.T.   Case     No.
    2012CA002783XXXXAG.
    Karen E. Maller of Powell, Carney, Maller, P.A., St. Petersburg, for
    appellants.
    Gary M. Carman and Richard F. Danese of Gray Robinson, P.A., Miami,
    for Appellee-Cadence Bank, N.A.
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellants, Boynton-Whitworth Farms, LLC, Dennis C. Grass, Charles
    F. McReynolds, John F. McReynolds and J. Dudley Parker appeal a Default
    Final Deficiency Judgment in Favor of Cadence Bank, N.A. We reverse the
    default final deficiency judgment because appellants were denied due
    process by having judgment entered against them without notice of the
    hearing on Cadence Bank’s Verified Motion for Default Deficiency Final
    Judgment. See NCNB Nat’l Bank of Florida v. Pyramid Corp., 
    497 So. 2d 1353
    , 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (when the jurisdiction of the court is
    invoked to grant a deficiency judgment, the defendant must be given notice
    and an opportunity to be heard); Merrill v. Nuzum, 
    471 So. 2d 128
    , 129
    (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (a deficiency is an unliquidated amount that entitles
    the defaulting party to notice of trial). Accordingly, we reverse and remand
    for further proceedings without addressing the remaining issues raised by
    appellant. See Talbot v. Rosenbaum, 
    142 So. 3d 965
    , 967-68 (Fla. 4th DCA
    2014); Minkoff v. Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp., 
    103 So. 3d 1049
    , 1051-52
    (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH Cellular, LLC, 
    957 So. 2d 662
    , 665-67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); B/G Amusements, Inc. v. Mystery Fun
    House, Inc., 
    381 So. 2d 318
    , 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
    Reversed and Remanded.
    STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
    *         *         *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 4D13-4731

Filed Date: 4/15/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016