LAWRENCE SHAPIRO v. LEYLA FARAJZADEH ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed October 6, 2021.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D21-333
    Lower Tribunal No. 15-25693
    ________________
    Lawrence Shapiro,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Leyla Farajzadeh,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
    County, Maria Espinosa Dennis, Judge.
    Lawrence J. Shapiro & Associates, P.A., and Lawrence J. Shapiro, for
    appellant.
    Richard A. Schurr, P.A., and Richard A. Schurr and Bonnie M. Sack,
    for appellee.
    Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Affirmed. See Rose v. Rose, 
    883 So. 2d 348
    , 349–50 (Fla. 3d DCA
    2004) (“Trial courts have broad discretion in ordering the payment of
    temporary fees and costs based upon the parties’ respective need and ability
    to pay. In the present case, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s
    well-reasoned order which requires the husband to pay the wife’s temporary
    attorney’s fees and costs in order to equalize the representation of the
    parties.”); Sinclair v. Sinclair, 
    804 So. 2d 589
    , 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“Our
    review reveals that there is competent, substantial evidence supporting the
    findings made by the trial court. The trial court is in the best position to weigh
    the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses, and it is not
    for this court to re-weigh the evidence or to substitute its judgment for that of
    the trial court.”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-0333

Filed Date: 10/6/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/6/2021