Florida Department of Revenue v. Scotty Weaver And Kelly Michelle Knapik , 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5795 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                       IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    REVENUE,                              FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    Appellant,
    v.                                    CASE NO. 1D15-3926
    SCOTTY WEAVER AND
    KELLY MICHELLE KNAPIK,
    Appellees.
    _____________________________/
    Opinion filed April 8, 2016.
    An appeal from an order of the Florida Department of Revenue.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant
    Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    No Appearance for Appellees.
    PER CURIAM.
    The Florida Department of Revenue raises two issues in this appeal of a Final
    Administrative Support Modification Order determining the child support obligation
    of Appellee Scotty Weaver (the father). In the first issue, the Department argues
    that the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by concluding that he lacked authority
    to enter a support order exceeding the amounts set forth in the Department’s
    Proposed Order to Modify Administrative Support Order based on new information
    developed at an evidentiary hearing that would increase the father’s child support
    obligation under the statutory child support guidelines. In the second issue, the
    Department argues that the Final Administrative Support Order is not supported by
    competent, substantial evidence. Consistent with our opinion in Department of
    Revenue v. Reyes, 
    181 So. 3d 1270
     (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), we resolve both issues by
    concluding that the ALJ was required to establish the father’s child support
    obligation based on the evidence presented at the hearing. By limiting the father’s
    child support obligation to the amounts contained in the proposed order,
    notwithstanding the evidence presented, the Final Administrative Support Order is
    contrary to Florida law and not supported by competent, substantial evidence.
    Accordingly, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.
    ROBERTS, C.J., SWANSON, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-3926

Citation Numbers: 187 So. 3d 1292, 2016 WL 1534084, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5795

Judges: Ray, Bilbrey, Jay

Filed Date: 4/15/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024