All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2016-04 |
Florida Department of Revenue v. Scotty Weaver And Kelly Michelle Knapik , 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5795 ( 2016 )
Menu:
-
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO REVENUE, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. CASE NO. 1D15-3926 SCOTTY WEAVER AND KELLY MICHELLE KNAPIK, Appellees. _____________________________/ Opinion filed April 8, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Florida Department of Revenue. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees. PER CURIAM. The Florida Department of Revenue raises two issues in this appeal of a Final Administrative Support Modification Order determining the child support obligation of Appellee Scotty Weaver (the father). In the first issue, the Department argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by concluding that he lacked authority to enter a support order exceeding the amounts set forth in the Department’s Proposed Order to Modify Administrative Support Order based on new information developed at an evidentiary hearing that would increase the father’s child support obligation under the statutory child support guidelines. In the second issue, the Department argues that the Final Administrative Support Order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Consistent with our opinion in Department of Revenue v. Reyes,
181 So. 3d 1270(Fla. 1st DCA 2015), we resolve both issues by concluding that the ALJ was required to establish the father’s child support obligation based on the evidence presented at the hearing. By limiting the father’s child support obligation to the amounts contained in the proposed order, notwithstanding the evidence presented, the Final Administrative Support Order is contrary to Florida law and not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Accordingly, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings. ROBERTS, C.J., SWANSON, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 15-3926
Citation Numbers: 187 So. 3d 1292, 2016 WL 1534084, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5795
Judges: Ray, Bilbrey, Jay
Filed Date: 4/15/2016
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024