Armstrong v. State , 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13017 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    ROBERT ARMSTRONG,                  )
    )
    Appellant,              )
    )
    v.                                 )                          Case No. 2D14-314
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
    )
    Appellee.               )
    ___________________________________)
    Opinion filed August 22, 2014.
    Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
    9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
    Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts,
    Judge.
    Robert Armstrong, pro se.
    MORRIS, Judge.
    Robert Armstrong appeals the postconviction court order summarily
    denying his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm
    the summary denial of ground two but reverse and remand for the postconviction court
    to consider ground one of Mr. Armstrong's motion.
    Mr. Armstrong pleaded no contest to attempted capital sexual battery and
    attempted lewd and lascivious molestation by a person over eighteen years upon a child
    under the age of twelve. In exchange for his pleas, Mr. Armstrong was sentenced to
    concurrent terms of twenty-three years' prison followed by ten years' sex offender
    probation on each count. The sentences in this case run concurrently with a five-year
    sentence imposed in another case.
    In ground one of his rule 3.800(a) motion, Mr. Armstrong alleged that his
    sentences are illegal because they exceed the statutory maximum sentences for his
    first- and second-degree felony convictions. The postconviction court did not address
    this claim in its order summarily denying Mr. Armstrong's motion, so we must reverse
    and remand the case for the postconviction court to consider the merits of this claim.
    We note that Mr. Armstrong's sentences appear to have been imposed
    pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. Therefore, if the postconviction court finds
    that his sentences are illegal, he may be resentenced within the statutory maximum for
    each count only with the State's agreement. See McDuffie v. State, 
    946 So. 2d 99
    , 100
    (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Lang v. State, 
    931 So. 2d 922
    , 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). If the
    State does not agree to such sentences, Mr. Armstrong must be allowed to withdraw his
    plea. See McDuffie, 
    946 So. 2d at 100
    ; Lang, 
    931 So. 2d at 922
    .
    Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
    KELLY and BLACK JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D14-314

Citation Numbers: 145 So. 3d 952, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13017, 2014 WL 4160010

Judges: Morris, Kelly, Black

Filed Date: 8/22/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024