Sabir Abdul-Haqq Yasir v. Howard C. Forman , 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13999 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    July Term 2014
    SABIR ABDUL-HAQQ YASIR,
    Appellant,
    v.
    HOWARD C. FORMAN, Clerk of Courts,
    Appellee.
    No. 4D13-3336
    [September 10, 2014]
    Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
    Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Matthew I. Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No.
    13000006WF10.
    Sabir Abdul-Haqq Yasir, Lake City, pro se.
    No appearance for appellee.
    FORST, J.
    The petitioner appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to tax
    costs. As neither the order nor the record explains the trial court’s
    rationale in denying the motion, we reverse and remand.
    Background
    The petitioner – who is incarcerated – sent two public records requests
    to the Broward County Clerk’s office, seeking copies of documents from
    the court file in his criminal case. The first request was dated September
    3, 2012, and the second was dated October 1, 2012. Seemingly receiving
    no response from the Clerk’s office, the petitioner sought a judicial means
    of compelling the requested documents. He filed a petition for writ of
    mandamus on December 26, 2012, which was granted by the trial court.
    With this mandate from the court, the Clerk’s office finally complied with
    the petitioner’s records requests. In doing so, the petitioner incurred costs
    for copies and mailing.
    The petitioner then filed a motion to tax costs. The trial court
    summarily denied this motion. The petitioner now appeals the denial of
    his motion to tax costs.
    Trial Court failed to make sufficient findings
    to support its summary denial of the motion.
    Mandamus is an appropriate means of compelling compliance with the
    Public Records Act. Weeks v. Golden, 
    764 So. 2d 633
    , 634 (Fla. 1st DCA
    2000). A party is entitled to “the reasonable costs of enforcement” under
    section 119.12, Florida Statutes (2013), when “such agency unlawfully
    refused to permit a public record to be inspected or copied[.]” “Unlawful
    refusal under section 119.12 includes not only affirmative refusal to
    produce records, but also unjustified delay in producing them.” Lilker v.
    Suwanee Valley Transit Auth., 
    133 So. 3d 654
    , 655-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014);
    see also Office of State Attorney for Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Fla. v.
    Gonzalez, 
    953 So. 2d 759
    , 760 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Barfield v. Town of
    Eatonville, 
    675 So. 2d 223
    , 224 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Brunson v. Dade Cnty.
    Sch. Bd., 
    525 So. 2d 933
     (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
    In this case, the petitioner sent two public records requests before
    having to resort to the courts in order to compel compliance with his
    requests. Nearly four months after the petitioner sent his first request,
    and with an order from the court, the Clerk’s office finally surrendered the
    requested documents. The order denying the petitioner’s motion to tax
    costs does not address this delay. Thus, we are unable to surmise whether
    the Clerk’s refusal/delay was justified. If not, then the petitioner would
    be entitled to his costs pursuant to section 119.12. Lilker, 
    133 So. 3d at 655-56
    .
    Although section 119.12 provides a basis for costs associated with
    enforcing compliance with the Public Records Act, some postage, envelope
    and copying costs can also be awarded to a party who is incarcerated so
    long as those costs are reasonable. Weeks v. Golden, 
    846 So. 2d 1247
    ,
    1249-50 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse the order denying
    the petitioner’s motion to tax costs and remand the case for further
    proceedings consistent with this opinion.
    Reversed and Remanded.
    STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
    *         *         *
    2
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    3