Tyson v. State , 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14937 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    SHAWN A. TYSON,                              )
    )
    Appellant,                      )
    )
    v.                                           )         Case No. 2D12-2296
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                            )
    )
    Appellee.                       )
    )
    Opinion filed September 24, 2014.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota
    County; Frederick A. Defuria, Judge.
    Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
    Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant Public
    Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for
    Appellee.
    CASE, JAMES R., Associate Senior Judge.
    Shawn A. Tyson appeals his judgments and sentences for two counts of
    first-degree murder. We affirm his judgments without discussion. However, as the
    State concedes, we must reverse his sentences of life in prison without the possibility of
    parole pursuant to the holding in Miller v. Alabama, 
    132 S. Ct. 2455
    (2012), because Mr.
    Tyson was sixteen years old when the crimes were committed. In 
    Miller, 132 S. Ct. at 2460-61
    , the Supreme Court held that a sentencing scheme requiring a mandatory
    sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile homicide offenders
    violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. We
    must therefore reverse Mr. Tyson's sentence and remand his case for a new sentencing
    hearing in compliance with Rodriguez-Giudicelli v. State, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D1089 (Fla.
    2d DCA May 23, 2014). As this court did in Rodriguez-Giudicelli, we certify the same
    question of great public importance:
    WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN
    MILLER V. ALABAMA, 
    132 S. Ct. 2455
    (2012), WHICH
    INVALIDATED SECTION 775.082(1)'S MANDATORY
    IMPOSITION OF LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE SENTENCES
    FOR JUVENILES CONVICTED OF FIRST–DEGREE
    MURDER, OPERATES TO REVIVE THE PRIOR
    SENTENCE OF LIFE WITH PAROLE ELIGIBILITY AFTER
    25 YEARS PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN THAT
    STATUTE?
    39 Fla. L. Weekly at D1089.
    Judgments affirmed, sentences reversed, and question certified.
    LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2D12-2296

Citation Numbers: 153 So. 3d 935, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14937, 2014 WL 4724439

Judges: James, Larose, Crenshaw

Filed Date: 9/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024