Reid v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed August 2, 2017.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D16-1997
    Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-29795, 13-29046
    ________________
    Ronald Reid,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    The State of Florida,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the
    Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge.
    Ronald Reid, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney
    General, for appellee.
    Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
    LAGOA, J.
    Defendant, Ronald Reid (“Reid”), appeals from the trial court’s order
    denying his motion for reduction or modification of sentence pursuant to Florida
    Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). Because the appeal is taken from a non-
    appealable order, we dismiss.
    On February 2, 2016, Reid entered into a negotiated global plea with the
    State and was sentenced to 96.22 months as a habitual felony offender. On March
    14, 2016, Reid filed a Rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction or modification of
    sentence. On June 9, 2016, the trial court denied the motion and found:
    [T]his Court does not have the legal authority to modify
    or reduce a sentence entered pursuant to a plea agreement
    between the State of Florida and the Defendant. State v.
    Gutierrez, 
    10 So. 3d 158
    (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). The
    Defendant’s sentence, imposed by this Court on February
    2, 2016, was pursuant to an agreement entered by the
    Defendant with the State of Florida. Defendant cannot
    circumvent the plea bargain by filing a motion to
    mitigate.
    This timely appeal followed.
    It is well-established that “[a]n order denying, on the merits, a motion for
    reduction of sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) . . . is not
    an appealable order.” Clewis v. State, 
    715 So. 2d 1129
    , 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998);
    see also, McKinzy v. State, 
    949 So. 2d 1153
    (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Royal v. State,
    
    736 So. 2d 157
    (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Lusskin v. State, 
    717 So. 2d 1076
    (Fla. 4th
    2
    DCA 1998); Bourjolly v. State, 
    623 So. 2d 870
    (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).1
    Accordingly, because the order at issue is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal.
    Appeal dismissed.
    1   In contrast, an order granting a Rule 3.800(c) motion that reduces a sentence
    imposed pursuant to a negotiated plea constitutes an appealable order. As this
    Court concluded in State v. Jordan, 
    783 So. 2d 1179
    , 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), the
    State, pursuant to section 924.07, Florida Statutes, is authorized “to appeal two
    types of sentences: 1) a sentence that is illegal, and 2) a sentence imposed ‘below
    the lowest permissible sentence established by the Criminal Punishment Code
    under chapter 921.’” A reduced sentence granted by a trial court which constitutes
    a downward departure sentence is appealable by the State under section
    924.07(1)(a), Florida Statutes. See State v. Swett, 
    772 So. 2d 48
    (Fla. 5th DCA
    2000); cf. 
    Jordan, 783 So. 2d at 1182
    .
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 3D16-1997

Judges: Suarez, Lagoa, Fernandez

Filed Date: 8/2/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024