Nationstar Mortgage v. Roque , 252 So. 3d 342 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed July 25, 2018.
    ________________
    No. 3D18-0613
    Lower Tribunal No. 14-31275
    ________________
    Nationstar Mortgage LLC, etc.,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Felicita Roque, et al.,
    Appellees.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice
    Butchko, Judge.
    Albertelli Law, and Teodora Siderova and Shannon T. Sinai (Tampa), for
    appellant.
    Jose M. Cervera, for appellees Ysabel Ynoa De De Leon and CUV087 Corp.
    Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.
    ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
    LINDSEY, J.
    Nationstar   Mortgage    LLC     DBA     Champion     Mortgage    Company
    (“Nationstar”) appeals the trial court’s Order Denying [Nationstar’s] Objection to
    Sale and Motion to Vacate November 8, 2017 Foreclosure Sale and Certificate of
    Sale, To Prevent the Clerk From Issuing Certificate of Title, and To Return the
    Third Party’s Sale Proceeds (“Objection to Sale and Motion to Vacate”) entered on
    January 29, 2018 and the trial court’s Order Denying [Nationstar’s] Motion for
    Rehearing (“Motion for Rehearing”) entered on March 2, 2018.
    The Final Judgment of Foreclosure was entered by the trial court on October
    20, 2016 and provided that Felicita Roque (the “Borrower”)’s right of redemption
    “terminated upon issuance of the Certificate of Sale.” On November 7, 2017, the
    trial court denied Nationstar’s emergency motion to cancel the November 8, 2017
    foreclosure sale. The foreclosure sale proceeded on November 8, 2017, and third
    party purchaser Ysabel Ynoa De De Leon and CUV087 Corp. (“Appellee-
    Purchasers”) submitted the highest bid. The Certificate of Sale was issued on
    November 14, 2017. Nationstar filed the Objection to Sale and Motion to Vacate
    on November 20, 2017, objecting to the foreclosure sale because timely
    reinstatement funds necessary to cure the default were received on November 8,
    2017—six days before the Certificate of Sale was issued.
    2
    After the trial court denied the Objection to Sale and Motion to Vacate on
    January 29, 2018, Nationstar filed the Motion for Rehearing and again reiterated
    that it had received the requisite reinstatement funds prior to the Certificate of Sale
    being issued. The trial court subsequently denied the Motion for Rehearing and
    Nationstar filed a timely Notice of Appeal on March 22, 2018. The Appellee-
    Purchasers filed a Confession of Error on June 29, 2018, conceding that the trial
    court erred in denying Nationstar’s Objection to Sale and Motion to Vacate
    because the Borrower properly exercised her right of redemption “within the time,
    manner, and procedure set forth” in paragraph seven of the Final Judgment of
    Foreclosure and in compliance with section 45.0315, Florida Statutes (2016). We
    agree.
    Florida courts have consistently held that section 45.0315 affords the trial
    court authority to set a time in the final judgment by which the mortgagor must
    exercise their right of redemption or forfeit that right.1 See 
    Emanuel, 655 So. 2d at 1
    “In 1993, the legislature enacted Florida Statutes section 45.0315, codifying the
    mortgagor's right of redemption and specifying that the mortgagor may cure the
    indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure sale at ‘any time before the later of the
    filing of a certificate of sale by the clerk of the court or the time specified in the
    judgment, order, or decree of foreclosure.’ The Third District observed that ‘the
    common law rule announced in Allstate v. Strasser, with respect to redemption,
    has been displaced by the enactment of section 45.0315, Florida Statutes, which
    exclusively governs the time, manner, and procedure for the claimed exercise of
    redemptive rights.’” Straub v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 
    182 So. 3d 878
    , 881 (Fla.
    4th DCA 2016) (first quoting § 45.0315, Fla. Stat. (2014); and then quoting
    Emanuel v. Bankers Trust Co., 
    655 So. 2d 247
    , 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (emphasis
    in original)).
    3
    249 (“[S]ection 45.0315, Florida Statutes (1993), explicitly empowers a court in
    the final judgment of foreclosure to fix the time in which the mortgagor may
    redeem”); see also Saidi v. Wasko, 
    687 So. 2d 10
    , 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (“This
    section empowers a court to fix a time in the final judgment, before which the
    mortgagor must exercise his right of redemption or forfeit that right.”).
    Here, it is undisputed that the Borrower reinstated and cured the default on
    the subject loan on the same day as the foreclosure sale, which was six days prior
    to the issuance of the Certificate of Sale. Accordingly, the Borrower properly
    exercised her right of redemption as outlined in the Final Judgment of Foreclosure.
    Based upon the record before us and the confession of error filed by Appellee-
    Purchasers, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Nationstar’s Objection to
    Sale and Motion to Vacate and the trial court’s order denying Nationstar’s Motion
    for Rehearing. We further remand with directions that the trial court enter an order
    consistent with this opinion and granting Nationstar’s Objection to Sale and
    Motion to Vacate.
    REVERSED AND REMANDED.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-0613

Citation Numbers: 252 So. 3d 342

Filed Date: 7/25/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/25/2018