GULAM JAFFER v. 153 REHC LLC, etc. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •       Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed June 1, 2022.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D21-1286
    Lower Tribunal No. 18-37773
    ________________
    Gulam Jaffer,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    153 REHC LLC, etc., et al.,
    Appellees.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos
    Lopez, Judge.
    Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert, and Alexis Fields
    (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
    Stolzenberg Gelles Flynn & Arango, LLP, Cheryl Zickler and Jared
    Gelles, for appellee 153 REHC LLC.
    Before EMAS, SCALES and GORDO, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Affirmed. See NLG, LLC v. Hazan, 
    151 So. 3d 455
    , 456 (Fla. 3d DCA
    2014) (noting a party’s “prior suit on the promissory note and recordation of
    a judgment on the note was not an election of remedies precluding the later
    enforcement of the mortgage.”); Nikooie v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 
    183 So. 3d 424
    , 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (noting the parties needed to have paid
    documentary stamp and intangible taxes on the principal mortgage amounts
    claimed by them); Barton v. MetroJax Prop. Holdings, LLC, 
    207 So. 3d 304
    ,
    307 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (“‘[Section] 701.02’s recording requirement is
    applicable only to (and enforceable by) competing creditors or subsequent
    bona fide purchasers of the mortgagee, not by the mortgagor.’” (quoting JP
    Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC, 
    6 So. 3d 681
    , 685 (Fla. 2d DCA
    2009))); § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (providing that the statute of limitations is
    five years for “[a]n action to foreclose a mortgage.”); § 687.03, Fla. Stat.
    (noting “if any loan, . . . or obligation exceeds $500,000 in amount or value,
    it shall not be usury or unlawful to reserve, charge, or take interest thereon
    unless the rate of interest exceeds” twenty-five percent); Tillman v. State,
    
    471 So. 2d 32
    , 35 (Fla. 1985) (“In order to be preserved for further review by
    a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific
    legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of
    that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-1286

Filed Date: 6/1/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/1/2022