Nunn v. Nunn ( 1966 )

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the briefs, an examination of the record, including a thorough reading of the depositions of appellant’s witnesses which appellant alleged the trial court had failed to read, and a review of the applicable law, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The decree entered by the court below is therefore affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and PIERCE, JJ., concur.