Parker v. State ( 1968 )

MANN, Judge.

Appellant claims that because one witness identified another man as the third participant in this armed robbery the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. But another witness testified that he was one of the robbers, and the jury resolved the conflict in testimony against Parker.

Oral argument is dispensed with pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A. as serving no useful purpose.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.