Hardy v. State , 228 So. 2d 440 ( 1969 )

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. motion was considered by the trial court to be frivolous and was denied.

After having considered the briefs and the record, we are compelled to affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.