Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit ( 1971 )

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.

Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.