All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1972-06 |
-
PER CURIAM. The sole question in this appeal is the admissibility of testimony by a State’s witness of a prior similar offense.
The testimony in question meets the test laid down in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), and it would serve no purpose to detail the similarity of the two offenses.
Due to the seriousness of the offense and the severity of the punishment, we have ex-haustedly reviewed the record on appeal and finding no reversible error affirm the judgment and sentence.
Affirmed.
PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 71-208
Citation Numbers: 263 So. 2d 599, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633
Judges: Hobson, Mann, Pierce
Filed Date: 6/16/1972
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024