![]() |
All Courts |
![]() |
Federal Courts |
![]() |
US Federal District Court Cases |
![]() |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
![]() |
1977-12 |
-
PER CURIAM. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 77-1051
Judges: Grimes, Hobson, Ryder
Filed Date: 12/28/1977
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024