Donahue v. State ( 1977 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.

    HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 77-1137

Judges: Grimes, Hobson, Ryder

Filed Date: 12/28/1977

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024