![]() |
All Courts |
![]() |
Federal Courts |
![]() |
US Federal District Court Cases |
![]() |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
![]() |
1981-09 |
-
BERANEK, Judge, concurring specially:
I also write separately to suggest a possible solution for resolution of similar future problems. Rule of Civil Procedure 1.300(c) states that the parties may stipulate that a deposition may be taken “in any manner.” Even if trial counsel must send substitute counsel to pinch hit at this deposition, a telephone conference hookup would allow trial counsel to remain in Florida, hear the deposition as it occurs, and confer with substitute counsel privately by phone during his cross-examination of the witness. I see no reason why the telephone and various other electronic means should not be employed in conjunction with and in addition to videotaped depositions.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 81-1259
Judges: Beranek, Glickstein, Letts
Filed Date: 9/16/1981
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024