Burns v. State ( 1982 )

PER CURIAM.

A trial judge’s findings should not be disturbed unless they are unsupported by the evidence. Sired v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla.1981). In this court, a trial court’s ruling on a Motion to Suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness, McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978), and reasonable inferences favor affirmance of the trial court. See Bova v. State, 392 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Churney v. State, 348 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.