Smith v. State ( 1982 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Smith’s convictions for burglary and grand theft and his sentences, but we do so without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because of the trial court’s failure to establish a factual basis for his guilty pleas. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.