All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1983-10 |
-
PER CURIAM. This appeal from a judgment and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere is dismissed because appellant did not reserve his right to appeal any issue when entering his plea of nolo contendere. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Chapin v. State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, if such presentation in the lower court has not been barred by some other limitation.
DISMISSED.
ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. AS-410
Citation Numbers: 438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709
Judges: Ervin, Mons, Nim, Thompson
Filed Date: 10/19/1983
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024