Osterink v. Moon ( 1983 )

PER CURIAM.

Finding support in the record for the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between the parties, we affirm that decision. We also affirm the trial court’s requirement of the return to the purchaser of his deposit money, plus expenses, and the denial of interest and attorney’s fees. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling that Hixon was not bound by the trust agreement.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.