Kandel v. Comeau Building, Inc. ( 1984 )

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the defendants, Bernard Kandel and Jacqueline E. Kandel, even though denominated as sub-lessees, were given an option to renew the lease in question by the lessor, which renewal option was reflected by Addendum No. 2 dated November 12,1980. Moreover, it clearly appears that the Kandels validly exercised their option and are entitled to its benefits.

The judgment on appeal is

REVERSED.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.