Davis v. State ( 1988 )

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Davis’ motion for correction of sentence. Cusic v. State, 512 So.2d 309 (Fla.2d DCA 1987); McCuiston v. State, 507 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). In so doing, we acknowledge conflict with Hall v. State, 511 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.