All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
1988-06 |
-
PER CURIAM. Concluding that the trial court’s instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).
Affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 87-2512
Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt, Pearson
Filed Date: 6/21/1988
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024